How to Do Things with Objectification

The Smart Set asked me to review Nancy Bauer’s “How to Do Things with Pornography.” Here’s the review as I last submitted it:

In “How to Do Things with Pornography,” feminist philosopher Nancy Bauer refers to a specific idea of pornography: the inherently harmful boogey creature that anti-pornography feminists have railed against since the 70s. A significant portion of the book is spent discussing the flaws in the anti-porn rhetoric of both Catharine MacKinnon and Rae Langton. All of which is in the service to what seems to the true focus of the book: arguing against philosophers’ interpretations of JL Austin’s How to Do Things with Words.

Austin’s philosophical work centered around language, specifically focusing on illocutions, perlocutions, and speech acts—uses of language where saying something is also doing. In the fifty five years since Austin’s death, a number of anti-pornography feminists have referenced Austin’s work in their attempts to undermine the protection that the first amendment provides adult films and the people who make them by framing it as something other than speech. Bauer disagrees with some of their finer points.

Declaring that the idea of pornography as a form of speech is overly simplistic, Bauer begins the wrap up of chapter five with a list of questions: “Who is doing the speaking? The subjects of the photographs? (And are they subjects or objects—or both?) The pornographers? And what exactly is being said? And to whom?”

Instead of attempting to answer those questions, she expresses surprise that “none of the people on either side of the pornography debates appears to be interested in doing [this work].” Bauer concludes by suggesting that that these questions are not explored due to the amount of pornography one would need to view and the amount of introspection one would need to have regarding that pornography and feelings on it. This would be an understandably distasteful task for people who believe pornography is inherently abusive towards women as a gender.  

Defining pornography and exploring what can be done with it are not Bauer’s subject. In How to Do Things with Pornography, pornography is merely the means with which Bauer achieves her ends.

Bauer treats pornography as a tool, using it discuss the academic discourse surrounding porn and sexual objectification, her interpretation of Austin’s lectures, the authority of philosophers to describe, and also their responsibility to consider what their own words do. This leads me to wonder if Bauer considered her own acts of objectification committed towards pornography—as a profession, category of media, and community of people who create it—throughout the course of her book.

I’m a pornographer. I have performed in a number of explicit videos, been professionally naked for more than a decade, and consumed a significant amount of all types of pornographic media. I believe that Bauer’s work checks off no less than three items on the list of Martha Nussbaum’s notions of objectification and Rae Langton’s additions to it. Bauer lists these notions in chapter three before arguing that Nussbaum is incorrect to frame objectification as a thing that can be negative, neutral, or positive, but she does seem to accept Nussbaum’s notions as a useful quantification of objectification.

Instrumentality is shown when Bauer uses pornography as a way to discuss her understanding of How to Do Things with Words, failing to define it or engage with it herself while using it for her own purposes in dealing with Austin.

Fungibility is shown when she hints at a description of pornography’s powers to arouse, stating that “within the pornographic mies-en-scene, there is no space for the concept of objectification.” Bauer effectively erases a number of pornographers who explicitly tackle the concept of objectification in their work—examples of which include Rinse Dream’s Cafe Flesh (1982), Kayden Kross and Manuel Ferrara’s Carter Cruise: Wide Open (2015), and my own work Graphic Depictions (2015)—and exhibits a tendency to equate the porn she has either consumed herself or consumed others’ descriptions of with what all porn is.

Silencing is shown in the glaring omission of any quotes from pornographers, be they producers, directors, performers, photographers, or writers. While Bauer’s book does focus on philosophy, she repeatedly references the words of Catherine MacKinnon—who, while she is a formidable lawyer and holds a PhD in political science, is not a philosopher. Since MacKinnon’s opinions are deemed authoritative enough for inclusion, failure to include or acknowledge at least some of the writings of pornographers that have been published in various books as well as academic examinations like the Porn Studies Journal, or even mainstream publications such as the New Statesman, the New York Times, or the Guardian. This can be understood as silencing of pornographers.

I’m sure that Bauer’s comments on Austin’s How to Do Things with Words are a worthwhile addition to the philosophical study of illocutionary force. Unfortunately, her choice to build this critique around pornography without deeply observing or accurately describing it—or even taking into account the work of modern academics regarding pornography—leaves her book littered with factually incorrect statements and wildly inaccurate generalizations.

x

Stoya

584x55_Stoya_11072014_JE